The real photovoltaic or other (wind, etc) and CLASSIC use only non-family independent of other conventional energy sources should also include the "Fund storing energy in order to take advantage of the energy produced by the sun even when it fails.
A system of this kind, as written, is absolutely prohibitive in contemporary because of the high costs.
For this reason we will always be dependent on suppliers of electricity even if it has a photovoltaic or wind power, etc., without storage, with regard to the "DARE" and "have".
Give and take means that, if a regular system of alternative energy is not the classic after a long series of checks and overcontrol of every kind (Put on red tape and the various laws and regulations municipal, provincial, regional and state) is also quite expensive to money and time, you could get there (they say .....) well to earn by selling the energy produced in excess of the providers themselves and with a very attractive price per KW (They always say them).
Many entrepreneurs fall into the small size also proposed rewarding undertakings made by the same suppliers and installers of electrical energy using capital also conspicuously perhaps with bank loans very positive for banks.
In my opinion though I do not think that these small entrepreneurs see really small or large profitable gains that can absorb the substantial cost without including interest, expenses and unforeseen damage or other insurance premiums of the complex. Large suppliers instead funded directly by the state, can afford any initiative of their sizes and with a lot less time and witnessed the first entrance, this, yes, really profitable.
Basically, in the end, even the small business non-classical alternative energy, you will always get the bill to pay little or no different from those of the past .-
We hope only that in the short or long term, the State takes very seriously the development of alternative energy, eliminating all the mechanisms of any kind which prevent the development of independent and autonomous mass which can only occur by creating industries competing with each other to decrease very substantial costs.
E 'and above to be taken into account in the "mind" that from January 2011, the various "rates of reimbursement or payment of the energy account by the GSE - Electrical Services Manager', always' s ENEL, the Italian state - through its relevant Ministries, will change these real attractive "prices." In practice, the Italian state will maintain the current rates or change in a negative way? It 's a question that weighs heavily on investment ....
The current situation of incentive systems in Italy is about 37,700 corresponding to a calculated power of 500 MW and will provide certainty with numerous other large power plants. The evolution is very positive and encouraging.
It is rather encouraging for the investigator or the professional craftsman poor that certainly can not compete with midsize and large companies.
Another important fact to note is that the various manufacturers and wholesale dealers of equipment for alternative energy (solar, wind, etc), apply their listings on the face potential "Peak to Peak" and not that of the actual yield real power generated in WAT. Like saying that a car makes 100 hp while in practice makes the half. The fact, for me, is absolutely not "digest".
With the real evolution in progress, let us hope that the performance of photovoltaic panels can be increased to 40 percent and perhaps even more, and the actual cost of a WAT reaches the quota of 0.25 cents. It might be feasible if we continue with the action taken.
Finally, please note that the processing of photovoltaic panels has been done on the site, link STUDIES / Lesson 1 .-
